Back to Newsletter Archive
Late breaking News from the Ruth Institute
Follow us on the web:

Share the good news of marriage with your friends by forwarding this newsletter to them!

Ruth’s Reminder Talking Point: The people who say, “Kids do fine with lesbian parents,” are really saying that kids don’t need dads. And don’t let anyone tell you that this is an exaggeration. This week’s article catches same-sex parenting advocates saying exactly that!

Ruth’s Reminder Action Item: Sign up for the Ruth Institute Gala Dinner! If you live too far away to come, consider sponsoring a student's attendance!

 

Judicial Activism Dr. J guests on Issues, Etc to discuss what judicial activism is and how it has impacted the issues under hot debate today. She also briefly discusses Better Courts Now, the group making waves by supporting judicial candidates who are specifically judges, not legislators. (Click the POD icon.)

Dear Dr. J.

Lutheran Public Radio: Dr. J is usually on live on Tuesdays from 2-2:15 p.m. Pacific Time (Click the link to listen live or find a station near you.)

June 24-27: Cincinnati, Ohio, NACFLM Conference(National Association of Catholic Family Life Ministers) This event is open to the public but requires early registration.

July 24: Santa Ana, California International Life Services conference

August 12: Los Angeles, California, It Takes a Family Gala event with Dr. Miriam Grossman, author of "Unprotected" and "You're Teaching My Child What?: A Physician Exposes the Lies of Sex Ed and How They Harm Your Child." She will speak on "Truths That Cannot be Told: How ideology trumps biology in sex education."

Dear Dr. J.

Do you need advice on how to improve your marriage or relationship, or on how to find the right person for you? Expert Dr. J is here for you. Click here to ask your question, which may be featured anonymously in this newsletter for the benefit of all.

Read past questions and answers here.

Need help with your marriage? You can also check out Dr. J's "101 Tips for a Happier Marriage!"

Follow us on Twitter!
as we keep you up to date on marriage and offer FUN tips for life-long married love!!! (Click the icon above.)



  • To prevent mailbox filters from deleting mailings from The Ruth Institute, add jmorse@ruthinstitute.org to your address book
June 22, 2010 Volume 5 Issue 19
The Blog is Killing Me!

I have moderated more blog comments than I think is physically safe for one person. The blog is simply On Fire lately. Seems that people are coming out of the woodwork, and the closet, to get their opinions voiced. Such heated debates we have going on! Why be a spectator? Join the foray: ruthblog.org.

Introducing Marriage Champions!

This is a new section we'll be adding to our newsletters, one in which we highlight a quote from or work done by a Ruth Institute supporter. This week's Marriage Champion is Kathleen, a pregnancy home director, who says:

“I am an 'old' married woman. In August we will celebrate 36 years together, some of them quite rough, but we are both so glad we stuck it out as we are enjoying each other very much! I had the privilege of hearing Dr. Morse speak to the pro-life directors conference in Dallas a few years ago and have received this newsletter since then. Keep shouting the truth to our young people; it is not too late to turn this ship around!”

Thank you for the encouragement, Kathleen, and for being a champion in helping pregnant women!

Gay Men Only?

by Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse

Equal, but…

“Kids Do as Well with Same Sex Parents,” the headlines screamed. I crossed swords with Judith Stacey, one of the authors of this most recent study, at a debate at Bowling Green State a few years ago. I asked her point blank if she believed men and women were completely interchangeable as parents. In front of that very friendly audience, she said absolutely: the gender of parents doesn’t matter. And so she says now, in this new article the media loved. But midway through the article, her argument shifts from a “no difference” argument to my favorite definition of feminism: men and women are identical, except women are better. Her article ends with an intimation that I believe tells strongly against same sex marriage. Redefining marriage will create a cultural climate that will drive men out of the family, and lead to the belief that the only good man is a gay man.

The claim that the gender of parents doesn’t matter is a crucial argument for same sex marriage advocates. Treating same sex unions like marriage amounts to saying that mothers and fathers are interchangeable. It is a coin toss from a child’s point of view, whether they have two moms, two dads, or one of each. So here is how Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz show that “Two Mommies are as Good as Mom and Dad.”

They say that the evidence purportedly showing that children need mothers and fathers doesn’t really prove any such thing. That research conflates five factors that are conceptually distinct: the number of parents, the gender of parents, sexual identity, marital status and “biogenetic relationship to children.” Children with married couple parents have one straight male and one straight female parent who are married to each other and both biologically related to them. To prove that heterosexual marriage is uniquely good for children, and superior to same sex parenting, we really need studies that separate all these factors. So, Stacey and Biblarz gathered 81 studies that compare families in these various dimensions.

But hold it right there: before we enter into this argument, look at what we are being asked to take on faith. The “biogenetic relationship to the child” is a ten dollar phrase meaning that the adults in the couple are actually the parents of the children. We have always taken for granted the idea that kids are entitled to a mom and a dad because a mom and a dad is what it takes to have a “biogenetic” origin in the first place. By breaking marriage down into its constituent elements, Stacey and Biblarz are asking us to break ourselves and our children, into pieces. The children in my household need not be products of my sexual union with anybody in particular, or even a sexual union at all. The birth parents can be different from the legal parents can be different from the caregiving parents.

And the kids are supposed to be ok with all this.

But put that to one side. Let’s also put to one side the question of whether the interpretative scheme that Stacey and Biblarz construct around the 81 studies they summarize is really the one and only possible interpretation of all that data. It would take another whole article to deconstruct that issue. Instead allow me a few quotes from “How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?” to illustrate my point that fatherhood itself is at stake in the same sex parenting debate.

“Two women who choose to parent together provide a ‘double dose of middle-class feminine approach to parenting.’”

“Women parenting without men scored higher on warmth and quality of interactions with their children than not only fathers, but also mothers who coparent with husbands.”

“If contemporary mothering and fathering seem to be converging,… research shows that sizable average differences remain that consistently favor women, inside or outside of marriage.”

See what I mean? Men and women are identical, except women are better.

Find the rest of this article, originally published at The Chuck Colson Center for Christian Worldview on the Ruth homepage.

Comment on this article

Support Ruth

If this email was forwarded to you from a friend and you would like to subscribe to our newsletter, click here to subscribe.

 

 
 
 
Ruth Institute