Answer: C.

Children in households with “unrelated adults” (usually the mothers’ boyfriends) were nearly 50 times more likely to die of inflicted injuries than households with two biological parents present.
Contrary to feminist propaganda, two biological parents married to each other are the safest homes for children.
Single mother households without an “unrelated adult” are no more dangerous to children than married couple households. This suggests that part of the problem with single moms is not the moms themselves, but the fact that they so often take up with new boyfriends.
D. According to a study of childhood deaths by inflicted injuries in the state of Missouri, stepparent and foster parent homes are no more likely to have kids die of inflicted injuries than homes with two biological parents. (I realize that other studies show increased risks for foster kids: this study has too few foster kids in the sample for those risks to show up!)

Schnitzer, Patricia G. and Bernard Ewigman, “Child Deaths Resulting from Inflicted Injuries: Household Risk Factors and Perpetrator Characteristics,” Pediatrics, Vol. 116, no. 5: 687-693. (Nov. 2005)

Answer: C

Female unions seem to have the highest divorce rates, followed by male unions, followed by opposite sex unions.
“For Sweden, the divorce risk for partnerships of men is 50% higher than the risk for heterosexual marriages, and that the divorce risk for female partnerships is nearly double that for men.”
“For Norway, divorce risks are 77% higher in lesbian partnerships than in those of gay men.” (The Norwegian data did not include a comparison with opposite sex couples.)
In California, the data is collected a little differently. The study looks at couples who describe themselves as partners, whether same sex or opposite sex. The study asks the question, how likely is it that these couples live in the same household five years later. Male couples were only 30% as likely, while female couples were less that 25% as likely, as heterosexual married couples, to be residing in the same household for five years.
The only contradictory data I have found to this pattern is from the Netherlands. In the Dutch data, same sex couples have a 3.15 times greater dissolution rate than opposite sex cohabiting couples, and a 3.15 x 3.66 or 11.5 times greater dissolution rate than opposite married couples. But, female couples seem to be more stable than male couples.

Please note one other thing: gender matters. The whole premise of same sex marriage is that marriage can, and should be, gender neutral. Gender should be irrelevant for marriage, for parenting and for sex itself. But in these data, male and female couples behave differently. Hence, gender is still a relevant characteristic, even in situations that offer legal and cultural support for same sex unions.
Andersson, Gunnar, Turid Noack, Ane Seierstad, and Harald Weedon-Fekjaer, “The Demographics of Same Sex Marriages in Norway and Sweden,” Demography Vol 43, No. 1 (February 2006) 79-98.
Gates, Gary, “Characteristics and Predictors of Coresidential Stability among Couples,” California Center for Population Research, Working Paper, CCPR-069-06, December 2006.
Kalmijn, Matthijs, Anneke Loeve, and Dorien Manting, “Income Dynamics in Couples and the Dissolution of Marriage and Cohabitation.” Demography, Vol. 44, No. 1, Feb 2007: 159-179.

Answer: By far, the largest single cause of death in the black community is abortion. In 2004, there were 209,603 abortions performed on black women, (compared with 312,233 abortions performed on white women.) There were only 287,315 deaths from all other causes among black Americans in 2004. The largest causes of death to post-birth African Americans were:

• Heart Diseases: 74,225
• Cancers of all sorts: 62,499
• Strokes: 18,118
• Diabetes: 12,834
• Accidents (unintentional injuries): 12,670
• Assault (homicide): 8,135

In addition, look at how numbers of abortions compare with the numbers of live births. In 2004, there were 616,074 live births to black mothers and 3,222,928 live births to white mothers.

Dividing the number of abortions by the number of live births, we find an abortion ratio of 97 abortions per 1,000 live births for white women and 340 abortions per live birth for black women.

Can you see why so many African-American leaders are becoming alarmed about the impact of abortion on their community?

“Abortion Surveillance, United States, 2004,” Center for Disease Control, MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report): Surveillance Summaries, November 23, 2007/ 56(SS09); 1-33. Table 9. “Deaths: Final Data for 2005,” National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 56, No. 1, Center for Disease Control, April 24, 2008, Table 1, and “Deaths: Final Data for 2004,” National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 55, No. 19, CDC, August 21, 2007, Table 12. “Deaths: Final Data for 2004,” National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 55, No. 19, CDC, August 21, 2007, Table 12. “Births: Final Data for 2004,”National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 55, no. 1, Center for Disease Control, September 29, 2006. Table 1.

Answer: This is a trick question! The correct answer is: it all depends on what you mean by “gay.” Is it exclusive sexual activity, recent sexual activity, sexual desire, self-identification, or some combination of these? The percent gay also depends on whether you are talking about men or women, as well as a bunch of other factors. You can make a case for several different numbers.

A. There is virtually no case for Answer A, 10%. The “10% of the population is gay” figure that is so commonly thrown around comes from Alfred Kinsey’s study. Kinsey’s study was flawed because he used a non-representative sample. He also used an open-ended interview, which means he did not have a fixed set of questions he asked each person. It has never been remotely replicated as a figure for the general population. His work is criticized extensively in the Lauman et. al study cited below.

B. The case for 3%, answer B, comes from a very recent study by The Williams Institute, at UCLA Law School. The Williams Institute is a pro-gay think tank, devoted to studying gay and lesbian issues. They estimate that in 2005, there were about 8.8 million gay, lesbian and bisexual people in the US. (Census Snapshot, The Williams Institute, December 2007). That same year, according to the US Census Bureau Population Estimates Program, the total population of the US was 295,560,549, or approximately 295.6 million. Therefore, according to those figures, the total percentage of the population that was gay, lesbian or bisexual was right around 3%. (8.8 million/295.6 million = 2.977%.)

C. You can get an answer of less than 1%, by asking the following question: what percent of the population has had exclusively same sex partners since puberty? According to data from the 1990’s, (admittedly a bit dated) .2% of women and .6% of men had exclusively same sex partners since puberty. This would be the most rigorous definition. It rules out the person who experiments, dabbles or is confused. This data is worth taking seriously, since it is the exhaustive, University of Chicago study, "The Social organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States" (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1994) by Edward O. Laumann, John H. Gagnon, Robert T. Michael, and Stuart Michaels.

Another compilation of data from roughly the same time frame found that 1.4% of women and 2.5% of men had exclusively same sex partners over the last five years. This result makes sense in conjunction with the previous result. A little bit higher percentage of people had exclusively same sex partners over the shorter period of time. [Dan Black, Gary Gates, Seth Sanders and Lowell Taylor, “Demographics of the Gay and Lesbian Population in the United States: Evidence from Available Systematic Data Sources,” Demography, vol 37, No. 2 (May, 2000) 139-154.]

D. The case for None of the Above now totally makes sense, doesn’t it? It depends on what population you are looking at. Did you notice that every number I quoted above was different between men and women? Pretty much everyone who studies this topic, looks at men and women separately. That’s because gender keeps showing up in the data as important. For instance, in the Gates et al study, only .6% of the female population self-identifies as lesbian, while three times as many men, 1.8%, describe themselves as gay.

Other variables matter as well. Just to give another, completely different example, the percentage of men who self-identified as gay varies with the size of the city you currently live in, and the size of the city you lived in at age 16! Of men currently living in the 12 largest cities, 14.3% had some same sex partners in the last 5 years. And of men who lived in urban areas between the ages of 14 and 16, 7% have had same sex partners in the last 5 years.

This is probably way more than you wanted to know! But the point is that this question is not as simple as we sometimes suppose.

Answer: the correct answer is D, none of the above, because NO ONE KNOWS! The infertility industry is so resistant to regulation or accountability, that no one collects the numbers that would allow us to answer this question. This is something to keep in mind if you are trying to evaluate the “success rates” of infertility clinics. The women without male partners may or may not have any physical impairment of their fertility. So successfully assisting them in achieving a pregnancy probably doesn’t tell you much about how successful they’ll be at helping a women with an actual medical problem with their fertility. Of course, the way the clinics report their success rates isn’t uniform either…. Those of you involved in family activism, might want to consider this as a legislative project. Ask your state legislature to require uniform reporting procedures and data collection for infertility clinics in your state.