Once again, the Vatican is facing backlash for using disgraced Jesuit’s Marko Rupnik’s art in a recent article on the Solemnity of the Sacred Heart of Jesus. As a survivor of clerical abuse, I offer my perspective on the necessity of removing Marko Rupnik’s artwork.
The criminal accusations against Rupnik have brought to light the deeply troubling presence of his artwork in sacred spaces. As an artist whose work has been tainted by his heinous actions, including using his victims as models, his art needs to be entirely removed from places of worship and all publications. His art cannot be separated from his acts of abuse. This is not simply a matter of artistic preference; rather, the Catholic Church has a moral and ethical obligation to honor and respect the survivors of clerical abuse.
There is an ongoing debate as to whether his art should be removed. Personally, I fail to see why there is even a reason to debate. Removing his work shouldn’t pose much of an issue or inconvenience. Many Catholics have witnessed the gradual removal of traditional artwork, statues, and altar rails in favor of a more modern, streamlined, oftentimes “cold” look. If churches can make these “improvements” so easily, then removing Rupnik’s art shouldn’t be an issue (monetarily speaking or otherwise). However, the real issue lies in the scandalous use of his work and the insensitive treatment of clerical abuse survivors.
Disgraceful to Survivors
Rupnik’s continued artistic presence in churches, Catholic publications, and even Catholic calendars serves as a painful reminder to victims. It not only perpetuates their trauma but also sends a clear message that Rupnik’s “art” takes precedence over the dignity and healing of those he harmed. The church’s use of his work is a tone-deaf and cruel response, failing to acknowledge the gravity of his crimes and the suffering of his victims. After all this time, one would think the Vatican had learned something from the abuse scandal.
A Wealth of Alternatives
The Catholic Church has plenty of alternatives when it comes to artwork. With its rich 2,000-year history, there are countless suitable masterpieces to choose from. There is plenty of artwork embodying true beauty and sanctity, and there are plenty of artists who aren’t using their artwork as a way to groom and sexually abuse people.
To be clear, this isn’t about participating in “cancel culture.” Art has the power to inspire and heal, but when tainted by the artist’s evil actions that had a part in the creation of the art, it takes on a vastly different tone. By continuing to display Rupnik’s artwork, the church suggests that his contributions are irreplaceable, which is far from the truth.
Artistic Integrity and Moral Responsibility
Rupnik lacks integrity and basic human morals. A Catholic artist’s inspiration, particularly that of a Catholic priest, should come from a place of goodness, holiness, and integrity. Yet, much of Rupnik’s art stems from the exploitation and abuse of others. With a 150-page dossier of credible accusations against him and an estimated 20 to 40 victims, his actions have forever tarnished his artistic legacy. His work has no place in the Catholic Church. The church must remove it to send a clear message that victims come first. This issue has recurred within the Catholic Church since the abuse scandal first broke.
Healing Through Art
The Catholic Church has an incredible opportunity to turn this terrible situation into a healing one. I suggest removing all of Rupnik’s art and commissioning pieces from clerical abuse survivors. This would not only be healing for them but also send a powerful statement of support. It could transform spaces previously marred by Rupnik’s presence into spaces of healing and renewal. This could symbolize a new beginning for the church, expressing sorrow for past insensitivities to survivors.
Apology and Reconciliation
It’s time for the Vatican to take a stand: it either stands with victims or it stands with Rupnik. Removing Rupnik’s art is essential, and an apology for the church’s insensitivity is necessary. Acknowledging the pain caused by these actions is the first step toward reconciliation. If the church replaces Rupnik’s works with pieces honoring human dignity and the sanctity of spaces, it can demonstrate a sincere commitment to justice and healing.
Moving Forward
Rupnik’s art needs to go. No one needs his so-called “masterpieces.” Someone needs to start a group project called “Taking Down the Trash!” I’m sure more than enough Catholics would be willing to put in the time and work to remove Rupnik’s art. I’ll bring the sledgehammer.
In closing, to my fellow clerical abuse survivors, as we observe the month of the Sacred Heart throughout June, remember the unconditional love Jesus has for you. You are precious and loved. I’m deeply sorry for the harm caused by the institutions meant to protect you. Your worth is immeasurable in God’s eyes. You deserve compassion and justice, and there is always hope for peace, healing, and freedom.
