technology the fertility industry uses for begetting children, ironically—and sadly—results in the deaths of more children than it does
in actual live births.
What is IVF? In vitro is Latin for “in glass,” and during IVF, egg follicles are removed from a woman and mixed with a man’s sperm in a petri dish with
the aim that they will fertilize. Upon fertilization, one or more of the embryonic children created are then transferred into a woman’s uterus in hopes
they will implant. Because there is only a 29.4 percent success rate of implantation*, doctors usually create several children “in glass” at once to have more on hand for further implantation attempts.
Treating Human Beings Like Slaves
What about these embryonic children “in glass”? Did you know they are genetically whole human beings—they are no longer their father or their mother
but have a material composition and behavior pattern distinct from both parents—yet
they have no legal rights of their own in this country? That is, they have the right to be created but not the right to live. At the whim of a parent,
a doctor, a technician, or a divorce court judge, these children can be:
- graded by appearance for their viability,
- genetically tested for their sex, chromosomal abnormalities, and diseases,
- discarded for their potential flaws,
- cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen to be stored, used, adopted, donated, tested, or killed,
- inserted into potentially inhospitable conditions in utero,
- and, if part of a multiple pregnancy, selectively terminated and sacrificed for the vitality of a perceived stronger brother or sister in the womb.
These children also, because of a complete lack of regulation in the fertility industry, have no legal right to know who their biological parents are,
nor do they have any legal access to their genetic medical history. At the very least, IVF disrespects the personhood of these children created “in
glass.”
The Office of Population Affairs currently estimates there are more than 600,000 of these children frozen in the United States today. That number does not take into account all of the IVF children who have died from failed implantation, being selectively
terminated in the womb, being disposed of at the hand of a technician, or not surviving the thawing process.
Your Own Child to Love, Cherish, and Sell
How did this happen? How did we as a culture begin creating extra human beings and then freezing and disposing of them for our own advantage? Dr. Jennifer
Roback Morse of the Ruth Institute explains in an interview with Todd Wilken on the radio program “Issues, Etc.”:
[N]obody ever sat down and said to themselves, ‘You know, I think it would be a great idea if anyone with money could do anything they want as far
as bringing a child into being…’ We just kind of drifted into this position, and the in vitro fertilization industry is pretty much unregulated…[P]eople
seem to think that as long as the adults get what they want, they don’t really have to think through what they’re doing to the individual child…I
think it is really quite appalling that what we’ve got is a system that is being driven by two things…One, it’s being driven by the passions
of the infertile woman, and, two, it’s being driven by the greed of the infertility industry…There’s nothing built in to in vitro fertilization
and the industry around it that stops people from going too far. Absolutely nothing.
IVF also now lists third-party reproduction among its top abuses. With enough money, American citizens can purchase every ingredient needed to produce
a child—sperm, egg, hormones, womb, you name it.
The Real Baby Farms
In a recent article by Tamar Lewin in The New York Times,
Dr. Earnest Zeringue of Davis, California, admits to buying eggs and sperm “from donors whose profiles are likely to have broad appeal” then using
them to create embryonic children which are then distributed to three or four families at a time.
Besides the obvious concerns raised about the eugenic leanings of such a practice, doctors, lawyers, and other conscience-stricken citizens struggle against
the real fear that these farmed children may, unawares, grow up to someday marry their own siblings.
There is no question these children are vulnerable and in need of protection, but Alana S. Newman writes in the Witherspoon Institute’s Public Discourse that “the rights of children are in direct conflict with the agenda of the fertility industry
and its clients.” They are also in direct conflict with the abortion industry, and any attempt to legalize the personhood of these children and to
defend their right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness will meet great resistance.
Yet defend them we must, because IVF and third-party reproduction is human trafficking, only on a much bigger, legally sanctioned scale.
*The success rate for implantation rises and lowers in correlation with a woman’s age and health.
